Withdraw black money from politics; wild cats can live a long time; the repeal is against the will of the voters; broadband needs good economics

Conrad Geiger: Congress: Pulling Black Money From US Climate Legislation

While addressing the urgency of the climate crisis is my main cause, I am writing this letter because we cannot make any progress on this issue – and on so many other important issues – unless we tackle the excessive influence of big donors.

The Disclose Act (S443) is a measure to make donations transparent. There is a congressional hearing next week on the law. He is supported by our two Colorado Senators, Bennett and Hickenlooper, but it is important for each of us to reach out to their offices to express our support so they can use this momentum to urge others to understand the importance of disclosure. .

Most importantly, we need to reach out to our friends and family on all sides – Republicans, Democrats, or Independents – in every state, and ask them to contact their senators to improve the odds that we can get closer to legislation that represents the will of the people instead of vested interests. If they don’t know the names or phone numbers of their senators, go to: www.senate.gov.

Conrad Geiger, Boulder

Maya Key: Outdoor Cats: Dedicated Caregivers Can Ensure a Long and Happy Life

What a delightful article, from the July 8 camera, about Beast, the handsome kitty who lives in the Boulder police station. As the founder and director of Wild at Heart, a local non-profit organization that provides care for feral (community) cats, I was thrilled to read about the wonderful care the staff provide at Beast. Not all cats can live in homes, and Beast is proof that with dedicated caregivers, outdoor cats can live long, happy lives.

Maya Key, rock

Meg Tilton: CU South: Repeal effort goes against voters’ wishes

Sigh. Didn’t we vote for CU South less than a year ago? Didn’t Boulder voters approve of annexation by a wide margin? And now it’s back on the ballot, in a did-you-really-think-it? repeal efforts that will waste everyone’s time.

Anyone new to the matter should know that there is more going on than a July 10 letter on camera suggests. The letter urges readers to join the repeal movement, offering a rather fictionalized portrayal of a “talented, courageous, all-benevolent group” resisting big developers. The issue is presented as one of corporate greed over the environment. The truth?

  • The annexation will provide affordable housing for Boulder residents, including UC students, faculty and staff.
  • The plan will provide flood protection. This will help thousands of residents, including the elderly residents of Frasier Meadows. (My own parents happen to live there.)
  • As part of the annexation agreement, CU will donate more than a third of the land as permanent open space.

CU purchased the CU South property over a quarter century ago. The university and the city of Boulder have worked hard on an annexation plan that balances stakeholder needs. Their work paid off and voters approved this compromise plan last November.

We live in a time of threat, with many real dangers to resist. And in this context, what are the proponents of repeal protesting? Not income inequality. Not climate change. Not our lying and seditious ex-president, nor our compromised Supreme Court. No. They dedicate their time to fighting the will of Boulder voters in 2021.

Those who seek to repeal annexation are not freedom fighters. I would like them to direct their energy elsewhere.

Meg Tilton, Boulder

Source link

Comments are closed.